JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (Feb. 4, 2021) โ By a vote of 103-43 today, the Missouri House passed a bill that would take on federal gun control; past, present and future. Passage into law would represent a major step toward ending federal acts that infringe on the right to keep and bear arms within the state.
Rep. Jered Taylor filed House Bill 85 (HB85) on Dec 1. Titled the โSecond Amendment Preservation Act,โ the legislation would ban any entity or person, including any public officer or employee of the state and its political subdivisions, from enforcing any past, present or future federal โacts, laws, executive orders, administrative orders, court orders, rules, regulations, statutes, or ordinancesโ that infringe on the right to keep and bear arms.
On Wednesday, the House approved some minor technical amendments to HB85 by a 107-43 vote. And on Thursday, the House gave the bill a 3rd read and final approval, sending the bill to the Senate for further consideration. The vote was 103-43, with 16 members absent.
A companion bill in the Senate (SB39)ย is moving forward as well.
DETAILS OF THE LEGISLATION
The bill includes a detailed definition of actions that qualify as โinfringement,โ including but not limited to:
- taxes and fees on firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition not common to all other goods and services that would have a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by law-abiding citizens;
- registration and tracking schemes applied to firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition that would have a chilling effect;
- any act forbidding the possession, ownership, or use or transfer of a firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition by law-abiding citizens;
- any act ordering the confiscation of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition from law-abiding citizens.
The proposed law defines โlaw-abiding citizenโ as โa person who is not otherwise precluded under state law from possessing a firearm.โ
Under the proposed law, infringement on the right to keep and bear arms would include the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Gun Control Act of 1968. Pres. Trumpโsย bump-stock ban, proposed federal โred-flag laws,โ and any future gun control schemes implemented by the federal government.
The legislation includes a provision that would allow anybody who violates the law and knowingly deprives somebody of their right to keep and bear arms as defined by the law to be sued for damages in civil court.
โSovereign, official, or qualified immunity shall not be an affirmative defense in such actions.โ
An amendment to the bill would subject law enforcement agencies and political subdivisions in Missouri to a civil penalty of not less than $50,000 for enforcing or attempting to enforce any of the infringements outlined by the law or for giving material aid and support to such enforcement efforts.
An amendment removed provisions that would have made federal agents who violate the law permanently ineligible to serve as a law enforcement officer or to supervise law enforcement officers for the state or any political subdivision of the state.
EFFECTIVE
The federal government relies heavily on state cooperation to implement and enforce almost all of its laws, regulations and acts โ including gun control. By simply withdrawing this necessary cooperation, states and localities can nullify many federal actions in effect. As noted by the National Governorsโ Association during the partial government shutdown of 2013, โstates are partners with the federal government onย mostย federal programs.โ
Based onย James Madisonโs advice for states and individualsย inย Federalist #46, a โrefusal to cooperate with officers of the Unionโ represents an extremely effective method to bring down federal gun control measures because most enforcement actions rely on help, support and leadership from state and local governments.
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano agreed. In a televised discussion on the issue,ย he noted that a single state taking this stepย would make federal gun laws โnearly impossibleโ to enforce.
โPartnerships donโt work too well when half the team quits,โ said Michael Boldin of the Tenth Amendment Center. โBy withdrawing all resources and participation in federal gun control, states and even local governments can help bring these unconstitutional acts to their much-needed end.โ
LEGAL BASIS
The state of Missouri can legally bar state agents from enforcing federal gun control. Refusal to cooperate with federal enforcement rests on a well-established legal principle known as theย anti-commandeering doctrine.
Simply put, the federal government cannot force states to help implement or enforce any federal act or program. Theย anti-commandeering doctrineย is based primarily on five Supreme Court cases dating back to 1842.ย Printz v. U.S.ย serves as the cornerstone.
โWe held in New York that Congress cannot compel the States to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program. Today we hold that Congress cannot circumvent that prohibition by conscripting the Statesโ officers directly. The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the Statesโ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policy making is involved, and no case by case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereigntyโ
WHATโS NEXT
HB85 will now move to the Senate for further consideration.
OTHER STATES
Similar legislation is also under consideration in a number of other states as listed below. Supporters are urged to contact their state senator and representative (find contact info here) to urge them to cosponsor and support.ย For all other states, suggestedย model legislation is available here (pdf)
- Texas HB635
- Montana HB258
- Wyoming SF81
- Nebraska LB188
- South Carolina H3042 and H3119
- Alabama HB157
- Oklahoma SB486
- Arkansas HB1390
- Arizona SB1328
- Freedom Isn’t Granted: It’s Exercised and Defended - February 18, 2026
- Who’s in Charge? The Founders on Sovereignty - February 4, 2026
- Usurpation: Weapon to Destroy Freedom - January 25, 2026