HONOLULU, Hawaii (Jan. 26, 2022) Bills introduced in the Hawaii House and Senate would limit government use of facial recognition technology. The proposed law would not only help protect privacy in Hawaii; it would also hinder one aspect of the federal surveillance state.

Sen. Karl Rhoads (D) and Sen. Chris Lee (D) filed Senate Bill 2005 (SB2005). A large coalition of 25 Democrats and one Republican filed House Bill 1869 (HB1869). The legislation would ban any government agency or any government official in Hawaii from sharing, accessing, or using a facial recognition system or any information obtained from such a system with a few exceptions.

SB2005/HB1869 would allow police to use facial recognition to compare surveillance photographs or videos to arrest booking photographs from the Hawaii criminal justice data center or in a photo lineup conducted pursuant to state law. Even so, information obtained from a facial recognition system would not constitute probable cause for an arrest.

The legislation would also allow the use of facial recognition at airports, to comply with the federal Real ID act, and in conjunction with thermal scanning to ID people with a dangerous disease “provided that information obtained from a facial recognition system shall be destroyed within sixty minutes after it is obtained.”

The proposed law would prohibit facial recognition surveillance.

This legislation is part of a broader nationwide movement to limit this invasive surveillance technology at the local and state level. In 2020, the New York governor signed a bill into law putting a moratorium on the use of facial recognition in schools, and the California governor signed a bill that imposes a 3-year ban on the use of the tech in conjunction with police body-worn cameras, leading to the shutdown of one of the biggest facial recognition programs in the country.

Passage of this legislation would also hinder a federal program to create a nationwide facial recognition database.


2019 report revealed that the federal government has turned state drivers’ license photos into a giant facial recognition database, putting virtually every driver in America in a perpetual electronic police lineup. The revelations generated widespread outrage, but the story wasn’t new. The federal government has been developing a massive facial recognition system for years.

The FBI rolled out a nationwide facial recognition program in the fall of 2014, with the goal of building a giant biometric database with pictures provided by the states and corporate friends.

In 2016, the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown Law released “The Perpetual Lineup,” a massive report on law enforcement use of facial recognition technology in the U.S. You can read the complete report at perpetuallineup.org. The organization conducted a year-long investigation and collected more than 15,000 pages of documents through more than 100 public records requests. The report paints a disturbing picture of intense cooperation between the federal government, and state and local law enforcement to develop a massive facial recognition database.

“Face recognition is a powerful technology that requires strict oversight. But those controls, by and large, don’t exist today,” report co-author Clare Garvie said. “With only a few exceptions, there are no laws governing police use of the technology, no standards ensuring its accuracy, and no systems checking for bias. It’s a wild west.”

Despite the outrage generated by these reports, Congress has done nothing to roll back this facial recognition program.

There are many technical and legal problems with facial recognition, including significant concerns about the accuracy of the technology, particularly when reading the facial features of minority populations. During a test run by the ACLU of Northern California, facial recognition misidentified 26 members of the California legislature as people in a database of arrest photos.

With facial recognition technology, police and other government officials have the capability to track individuals in real-time. These systems allow law enforcement agents to use video cameras and continually scan everybody who walks by. According to the report, several major police departments have expressed an interest in this type of real-time tracking. Documents revealed agencies in at least five major cities, including Los Angeles, either claimed to run real-time face recognition off of street cameras, bought technology with the capability, or expressed written interest in buying it.

In all likelihood, the federal government heavily involves itself in helping state and local agencies obtain this technology. The feds provide grant money to local law enforcement agencies for a vast array of surveillance gear, including ALPRs, stingray devices and drones. The federal government essentially encourages and funds a giant nationwide surveillance net and then taps into the information via fusion centers and the Information Sharing Environment (ISE).

Fusion centers were sold as a tool to combat terrorism, but that is not how they are being used. The ACLU pointed to a bipartisan congressional report to demonstrate the true nature of government fusion centers: “They haven’t contributed anything meaningful to counterterrorism efforts. Instead, they have largely served as police surveillance and information sharing nodes for law enforcement efforts targeting the frequent subjects of police attention: Black and brown people, immigrants, dissidents, and the poor.”

Fusion centers operate within the broader ISE. According to its website, the ISE “provides analysts, operators, and investigators with information needed to enhance national security. These analysts, operators, and investigators…have mission needs to collaborate and share information with each other and with private sector partners and our foreign allies.” In other words, ISE serves as a conduit for the sharing of information gathered without a warrant. Known ISE partners include the Office of Director of National Intelligence which oversees 17 federal agencies and organizations, including the NSA. ISE utilizes these partnerships to collect and share data on the millions of unwitting people they track.

Reports that the Berkeley Police Department in cooperation with a federal fusion center deployed cameras equipped to surveil a “free speech” rally and Antifa counterprotests provided the first solid link between the federal government and local authorities in facial recognition surveillance.

In a nutshell, without state and local cooperation, the feds have a much more difficult time gathering information. Passage of state laws and local ordinances banning and limiting facial recognition eliminates one avenue for gathering facial recognition data. Simply put, data that doesn’t exist cannot be entered into federal databases.


SB2005 was referred to the Senate Government Operations Committee where it must pass by a majority vote before moving on to the Energy, Economic Development and Tourism Committee. HB1869 had not been referred to a committee at the time of this report.

Mike Maharrey