ST. PAUL, Minn. (Jan. 23, 2023) โ A bill introduced in the Minnesota Senate would prohibit law enforcement from denying applications for gun carry permits solely based on a person’s enrollment in the medical cannabis registry.
Sen. Mark Koranh, Jeff Howe, and Bill Lieske introduced Senate Bill 89 (SF89) on Jan. 10. Under the proposed law, a person could not be denied the right to purchase, own, possess, or carry a firearm solely on the basis that the person is a qualifying patient in the state’s medical marijuana program.
State and local agencies would also be prohibited from inquiring about a person’s status as a qualifying patient or accessing a database containing the identities of qualifying patients or obtain information for the purpose of approving or disapproving a person from purchasing, owning, possessing, or carrying a firearm.
Asย Suzanne Sherman noted in an article for the Tenth Amendment Center, the federal government has long claimed the power to restrict the right to keep and bear arms of medical marijuana patients:
If you purchase a firearm from an FFL, you will be presented with the Firearms Transaction Record form 4473, which you must, under penalty of perjury, answer fully and truthfully. You may see it for yourselfย HERE.
Question 11(c) asks prospective gun purchasers if they are unlawfully using any controlled substances. You think, โHey, I can answer โno,โ as marijuana is now legal in my state. Immediately following the inquiry is the following admonition (in bold letters):
โWarning: The use or possession of marijuana remains unlawful under Federal law, regardless of whether it has been legalized or decriminalized for medicinal or recreational purposes in the state where you reside.โ
Not surprisingly, in 2016, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of appeals ruled that this restriction does not violate the Second Amendment.
Most states have adopted this federal ban on owning firearms for medical marijuana users, or simply help in its enforcement. In Hawaii, for example, police sent letters to medical marijuana patients who owned guns telling them they hadย 30 days to surrender their weapons.
While the passage of SF89 wouldnโt overturn the federal Gun Control Act of 1968, it would end state and local enforcement of one aspect of that unconstitutional act in Minnesota. And as weโve seen so prominently in immigration sanctuary cities and states with marijuana legalization, when state and local enforcement ends, the federal government has an extremely difficult time enforcing their acts.
Based onย James Madisonโs advice for states and individuals inย Federalist #46, a โrefusal to cooperate with officers of the Unionโ offers an extremely effective method to bring down federal gun control measures because most enforcement actions rely on help, support and leadership from the states. Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano agreed. In a televised discussion on the issue,ย he noted that a single state taking this stepย would make federal gun laws โnearly impossibleโ to enforce.
In 2018, Utah became the first state to pass legislation to help make federal gun bans for medical marijuana patients โnearly impossibleโ to enforce. Theย law prohibitsย expending any state or local resources, including an officerโs time, to โenforce a law that restricts an individualโs right to acquire, own, or possess a firearm based solely on the individualโs possession or use of cannabis in accordance with state medical cannabis laws.โ
WHATโS NEXT
SF89 has been referred to the Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee, where it must get a hearing and pass by a majority vote before moving forward in the legislative process.
- Louisiana House Unanimously Passes Bill To Legalize Limited Raw Milk Sales - May 1, 2024
- Rhode Island Senate Committee Holds Hearing on Bill to Legalize Raw Milk Sales; Foundation to Nullify Federal Prohibition Scheme - April 15, 2024
- Minnesota Bill Would Establish State Process to End Qualified Immunity - March 18, 2024