Progressives have done a complete 180 on the Constitution over the last few week. And so have conservatives.

Typical progressive narrative, circa 2009-2016:

The Constitution is a โ€œliving document,โ€ the expansion of executive authority is justified under numerous circumstances, the president is merely repeating the precedents of his predecessors, and the president has a pen and a phone to pass edicts when Congress refuses to act.

Typical progressive narrative, now:

The Constitution imposes rigid boundaries on the executive, executive authority is confined to overt parameters that can never be violated, the duplicitous acts of prior executive occupants donโ€™t justify modern executive edicts, and the president cannot supplant the legislative process whatsoever.

I say welcome to the club, I just hope that youโ€™re willing to stay here for awhile – as in, always.

And since this cuts both ways, many “conservatives” recently have done the exact opposite 180. The executive power they complained about for eight years is now A-OK.

Dave Benner