<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Misunderstanding Necessary and Proper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:03:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SOTU: What About the Constitution? &#8211; Florida Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>SOTU: What About the Constitution? &#8211; Florida Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=366#comment-445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] mean the federal government can do ANYTHING defined as generally beneficial? What does “necessary and proper” really mean?  Get the New Book [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mean the federal government can do ANYTHING defined as generally beneficial? What does “necessary and proper” really mean?  Get the New Book [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOTU: What About the Constitution? &#124; don&#039;t tread on cat</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>SOTU: What About the Constitution? &#124; don&#039;t tread on cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=366#comment-444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] mean the federal government can do ANYTHING defined as generally beneficial? What does “necessary and proper” really [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mean the federal government can do ANYTHING defined as generally beneficial? What does “necessary and proper” really [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does The Arizona Immigration Law Violate The Constitution? &#124; STATESMAN SENTINEL</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Does The Arizona Immigration Law Violate The Constitution? &#124; STATESMAN SENTINEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 02:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=366#comment-443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] one also has to then consider the common law doctrine of principles and incidents (i.e. the necessary and proper clause) to find authorization for anything not spelled out in the [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one also has to then consider the common law doctrine of principles and incidents (i.e. the necessary and proper clause) to find authorization for anything not spelled out in the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal Court Makes Rare Ruling in Favor of the 10th Amendment &#171; Peace &#38; Nonviolence Project</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal Court Makes Rare Ruling in Favor of the 10th Amendment &#171; Peace &#38; Nonviolence Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=366#comment-442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to be our agent for certain enumerated, or listed, purposes – and nothing more. (even the Necessary and Proper clause would be a huge stretch on this social [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be our agent for certain enumerated, or listed, purposes – and nothing more. (even the Necessary and Proper clause would be a huge stretch on this social [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal Court Makes Rare Ruling in Favor of the 10th Amendment &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal Court Makes Rare Ruling in Favor of the 10th Amendment &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=366#comment-441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to be our agent for certain enumerated, or listed, purposes &#8211; and nothing more. (even the Necessary and Proper clause would be a huge stretch on this social [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be our agent for certain enumerated, or listed, purposes &#8211; and nothing more. (even the Necessary and Proper clause would be a huge stretch on this social [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Immigration and Naturalization : STATESMAN SENTINEL</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Immigration and Naturalization : STATESMAN SENTINEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=366#comment-440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] one also has to then consider the common law doctrine of principles and incidents (i.e. the necessary and proper clause) to find authorization for anything not spelled out in the [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one also has to then consider the common law doctrine of principles and incidents (i.e. the necessary and proper clause) to find authorization for anything not spelled out in the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Immigration vs Naturalization&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Immigration vs Naturalization&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=366#comment-439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] one also has to then consider the common law doctrine of principles and incidents (i.e. the necessary and proper clause) to find authorization for anything not spelled out in the [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one also has to then consider the common law doctrine of principles and incidents (i.e. the necessary and proper clause) to find authorization for anything not spelled out in the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lehigh Valley Independent’s Tenther Coverage&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lehigh Valley Independent’s Tenther Coverage&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=366#comment-438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mr. Geeting had run a couple web searches, he might have instead closed with this excerpt from the Tenth Amendment Center, The 10th Amendment doesn’t prohibit the feds from doing anything that “isn’t specifically [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mr. Geeting had run a couple web searches, he might have instead closed with this excerpt from the Tenth Amendment Center, The 10th Amendment doesn’t prohibit the feds from doing anything that “isn’t specifically [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lehigh Valley Independent&#8217;s Tenther Coverage&#160;&#124;&#160;Pennsylvania Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lehigh Valley Independent&#8217;s Tenther Coverage&#160;&#124;&#160;Pennsylvania Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=366#comment-437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mr. Geeting had run a couple web searches, he might have instead closed with this excerpt from the Tenth Amendment Center, The 10th Amendment doesn’t prohibit the feds from doing anything that “isn’t specifically [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mr. Geeting had run a couple web searches, he might have instead closed with this excerpt from the Tenth Amendment Center, The 10th Amendment doesn’t prohibit the feds from doing anything that “isn’t specifically [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Would Madison Do? &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/misunderstanding-necessary-and-proper/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>What Would Madison Do? &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=366#comment-436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] among the Framers of our legal system, Madison understood that when two laws clash, the higher one wins out. True to his oath of office, he refused to challenge the Constitution by endorsing an invalid [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] among the Framers of our legal system, Madison understood that when two laws clash, the higher one wins out. True to his oath of office, he refused to challenge the Constitution by endorsing an invalid [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
