Will Georgia Nullify National Health Care?

Bookmark and Share

Written by: Michael Boldin

georgia-flagGeorgia State Representative Calvin Hill has introduced House Resolution 1086 (HR1086), which proposes a Georgia State Constitutional Amendment “so as to provide that no law or rule or regulation shall compel any person, employer, or health care provider to participate in any health care system and to authorize persons and employers to pay directly for lawful health care services without penalties or fines; to provide for the submission of this amendment for ratification or rejection; and for other purposes.”

If approved by both houses of the Georgia legislature, it will go to a ballot vote for final approval by the citizens of the state.

Georgia joins Ohio, Florida and a number of other states considering similar state Constitutional Amendments to effectively nullify, or resist any future national health care plan.

New Hampshire recently introduced a bill to make law that not only makes federal restrictions of health care choices illegal in the state, but also expressly prohibits interference in these choices by federal agents and requires state agencies to interpose as a protection.
Click here to learn more.

CLICK HERE to see the Tenth Amendment Center’s Health Care Nullification Tracking Page

Michael Boldin is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA.

If you enjoyed this post:
Click Here to Get the Free Tenth Amendment Center Newsletter,

Or make a donation to help keep this site active.

16 Responses to “Will Georgia Nullify National Health Care?”

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, John Tandlich. John Tandlich said: RT @TenthAmendment: #10th: Will Georgia #Nullify National Health Care? http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/will-georgia-nullify … [...]

  2. Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendment: #10th: Will Georgia #Nullify National Health Care? http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/will-georgia-nullify-national-health-care/...

  3. [...] } From the Tenth Amendment Center: Georgia State Representative Calvin Hill has introduced House Resolution 1086 (HR1086), which [...]

  4. snopercod says:

    Unfortunately, Nancy Pelosi is way ahead of us. She put language in the House Bill so that if a state chooses to ‘opt out’, they lose ALL federal funding in the medical area and more. The Pelosicare bill reads:

    Subtitle E—Miscellaneous

    SEC. 2585. STATES FAILING TO ADHERE TO CERTAIN EMPLOYMENT OBLIGATIONS.

    A State is eligible for Federal funds under the provisions of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) only if the State—

    (1) agrees to be subject in its capacity as an employer to each obligation under Division A [The meat of the Bill] of this Act and the amendments made by such division applicable to persons in their capacity as an employer; and

    (2) assures that all political subdivisions in the State will do the same.

    I went to Title 42 of the U.S. Codes starting with Section 201 (definitions), and eventually came to Chapter 7 – Social Security. In that section, the following grants are included:

    GRANTS TO STATES FOR OLD-AGE ASSISTANCE
    FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS, AND DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS
    GRANTS TO STATES FOR UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION
    GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD-WELFARE SERVICES
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH SERVICES BLOCK GRANT
    TEMPORARY STATE FISCAL RELIEF
    SPECIAL BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN WORLD WAR II VETERANS
    EMPLOYMENT SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE FINANCING
    GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID TO BLIND
    GENERAL PROVISIONS, PEER REVIEW, AND ADMINISTRATIVE SIMPLIFICATION
    ADVANCES TO STATE UNEMPLOYMENT FUNDS
    RECONVERSION UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS FOR SEAMEN
    GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID TO PERMANENTLY AND TOTALLY DISABLED
    UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
    SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED
    GRANTS FOR PLANNING COMPREHENSIVE ACTION TO COMBAT MENTAL RETARDATION
    HEALTH INSURANCE FOR AGED AND DISABLED
    GRANTS TO STATES FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
    BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES FOR SOCIAL SERVICES
    STATE CHILDRENS HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM

    Since the wording of the Pelosicare Bill says “Et seq.” (An abbreviation of the Latin phrase et sequens… used to identify the sections or subsections that follow it.) I assume that the feds will cut off all that money to any state which doesn’t comply with “Division A”, which is the meat of the bill.

    • Cre8ivE says:

      Very true – and not surprising, as that has been how they teased away our rights little by little up to this point. The interesting tack will be when the States, exercising their nullification powers – finally realize that they should also pass similar legislation such that their citizenry need not pay those Federal taxes on such unequally apportioned social programs for which the Federal government has no Constitutional Authority.
      THEN we'll be right back at one of the big reasons we fought the war for independence in the first place… taxation.

  5. [...] Carolina joins Georgia, Ohio, Florida and a number of other states considering similar state Constitutional Amendments to [...]

  6. [...] joins Georgia, Ohio, Florida and a number of other states considering similar state Constitutional Amendments to [...]

  7. [...] joins South Carolina, Georgia, Ohio, Florida and a number of other states also considering legislation or state Constitutional [...]

  8. [...] this proposed legislation, Washington joins fifteen other states, including South Carolina, Georgia, Ohio, and Florida also considering legislation or state Constitutional Amendments to effectively [...]

  9. [...] joins Georgia, Ohio, Florida and a number of other states considering legislation or state Constitutional [...]

  10. The health care bill is unconstitutional. Congress does not have the legal authority to make it mandatory for anyone to buy or have insurance.

  11. guest says:

    I think that you a re missing the point. US citizens already have a government-run, national healthcare program; it is called Medicare. It provides healthcare coverage to those that cannot afford high priced personal plans; it does not force anyone to drop their own coverage; and it is subsidized by every worker in America. What would be so bad about widening the coverage of that plan to include, say, another 100 million people, with ,say, another 31 million new payers(people not already paying into the system) paying for it?

    • Patriot says:

      BECAUSE MEDICARE IS BANKRUPT, FILLED WITH CORRUPTION, and extending that to everyone will not only bankrupt the MEDICARE system, it will bankrupt the nation. There is NOTHING good about Medicare. Doctors are running from it daily!

  12. [...] * Many state governments are planning to challenge Obamacare on Constitutional grounds * And some states are even changing their own Constitutions in order to resist this massive federal en… [...]

  13. Two ways to nullify…
    Remove the USURPER in the White House and that will render all he's signed null and void.
    Do it at the State level
    Get with your County GOP leaders and ask that nullification of the Health bill be put on the ballot.

  14. [...] so absurd that it just can’t be true; it’s the joke you make when mocking Arizona, Georgia and Texas. So when I was told my state senator, Bill Ingebrigtsen (R-SD11), introduced a [...]

Leave a Reply