<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A &#8220;New&#8221; Declaration of Independence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:16:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention A “New” Declaration of Independence &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention A “New” Declaration of Independence &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2880#comment-1928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, Andi Silver, Andi Silver, James D. Rhodes, James D. Rhodes and others. James D. Rhodes said: RT @TenthAmendment: #10th: A &quot;New&quot; Declaration of Independence http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/ [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, Andi Silver, Andi Silver, James D. Rhodes, James D. Rhodes and others. James D. Rhodes said: RT @TenthAmendment: #10th: A &quot;New&quot; Declaration of Independence <a href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Graziano DeSanto</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Graziano DeSanto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2880#comment-1927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark is right on about what our government is doing to us. We the people need to take action and take our country back. We need another candidate like Reagan. Lets get out there and find the right person and help get them elected. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark is right on about what our government is doing to us. We the people need to take action and take our country back. We need another candidate like Reagan. Lets get out there and find the right person and help get them elected. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Berryman</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Berryman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2880#comment-1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Kreslins, with help and support from &quot;brothers&quot; Joshua Lyons, Jim Lehmann, Clint Brown, and more...are outlining the best case ever for &quot;whatever is the next step above REFORM.&quot; 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.WeSurroundThemFrederick.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.WeSurroundThemFrederick.com&lt;/a&gt;  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Kreslins, with help and support from &quot;brothers&quot; Joshua Lyons, Jim Lehmann, Clint Brown, and more&#8230;are outlining the best case ever for &quot;whatever is the next step above REFORM.&quot; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.WeSurroundThemFrederick.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.WeSurroundThemFrederick.com</a>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clay barham</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator>clay barham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2880#comment-1925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would say the only party that offers Tea Party people anything is the 19th century Democrats who followed Jefferson and Madison, as cited in The Changing Face of Democrats on Amazon.  The modern Democrats follow Rousseau and Marx, the old world elite few who cannot believe people could even understand what they are standing for, and Republicans, who follow Hamilton, Clay, Lincoln, TR and McCain offer little, unless their party returns to Reagan who did offer much like the early Democrats.  claysamerica.com ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say the only party that offers Tea Party people anything is the 19th century Democrats who followed Jefferson and Madison, as cited in The Changing Face of Democrats on Amazon.  The modern Democrats follow Rousseau and Marx, the old world elite few who cannot believe people could even understand what they are standing for, and Republicans, who follow Hamilton, Clay, Lincoln, TR and McCain offer little, unless their party returns to Reagan who did offer much like the early Democrats.  claysamerica.com </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Frum</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>John Frum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2880#comment-1924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Well worded, and limited enough to have universal appeal. One petition with many signatures will not do. 300,000,000 individual copies sent to each Representative, each Senator, each Executive, The Supreme Court,and Every major news outlet and many thousands to local media will be hard to ignore. This could work and will be less taxing than protest rallies.  
  p.s. There are agencies that expect allot of mail each spring also. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZDZzbUxrnM&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZDZzbUxrnM&lt;/a&gt;    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  Well worded, and limited enough to have universal appeal. One petition with many signatures will not do. 300,000,000 individual copies sent to each Representative, each Senator, each Executive, The Supreme Court,and Every major news outlet and many thousands to local media will be hard to ignore. This could work and will be less taxing than protest rallies.<br />
  p.s. There are agencies that expect allot of mail each spring also.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZDZzbUxrnM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZDZzbUxrnM</a>    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2880#comment-1923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendment: #10th: A &quot;New&quot; Declaration of Independence http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendment: #10th: A &#8220;New&#8221; Declaration of Independence <a href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonny Eachus</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonny Eachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2880#comment-1922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Mark may be a great radio host, he should get someone to proofread his writing, especially on such an important subject. His spelling and grammar leave a bit to be desired, which could give people the wrong impression when reading this material. 
 
Along the line of constructive criticism (and it is intended as constructive, not criticism for its own sake), I would like to point out that the list of grievances could be worded much better. For example, it isn&#039;t necessary to mention Marx. It is enough to point out that taking from the productive and giving to the unproductive is against the principles of a free market economy, and violates the spirit of the mandate originally given the Federal government. (See the story of Representative David Crockett known as &quot;Sockdolager&quot;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/sock.htm,&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/sock.htm,&lt;/a&gt; originally condensed from &quot;The Life of Colonel David Crockett&quot; by Edward S. Ellis, 1884.) 
 
Further, while many of the Founders were religious men (and some were not), while unalienable rights were acknowledged to be endowed by a Creator, they were alternatively thought of by some as being inherent by virtue of Human existence. The Founders also made it very clear, in their attitudes and written statements, that they felt that while religious observance should be free, religion itself should hold no influence in Government. So Mark&#039;s statements about &quot;recognizing the Laws of ... Nature&#8217;s God&quot;, and &quot;... ceased to recognize that our rights come ONLY from our Creator&quot; (emphasis mine) really have no place here. In today&#039;s atmosphere of scientific understanding and mistrust of organized religion, such statements can only lose people from the following. They will not result in overall gain. 
 
Just in general, the list of grievances could be much better worded. There are some serious omissions and there are other things that arguably should not be there, at least in the form they appear. If the idea is to gain followers and intellectual mind share, this could be done much better. 
 
I agree with most of the sentiment, just not the wording. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Mark may be a great radio host, he should get someone to proofread his writing, especially on such an important subject. His spelling and grammar leave a bit to be desired, which could give people the wrong impression when reading this material. </p>
<p>Along the line of constructive criticism (and it is intended as constructive, not criticism for its own sake), I would like to point out that the list of grievances could be worded much better. For example, it isn&#039;t necessary to mention Marx. It is enough to point out that taking from the productive and giving to the unproductive is against the principles of a free market economy, and violates the spirit of the mandate originally given the Federal government. (See the story of Representative David Crockett known as &quot;Sockdolager&quot;: <a href="http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/sock.htm," rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/sock.htm" rel="nofollow">http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/sock.htm</a>, originally condensed from &quot;The Life of Colonel David Crockett&quot; by Edward S. Ellis, 1884.) </p>
<p>Further, while many of the Founders were religious men (and some were not), while unalienable rights were acknowledged to be endowed by a Creator, they were alternatively thought of by some as being inherent by virtue of Human existence. The Founders also made it very clear, in their attitudes and written statements, that they felt that while religious observance should be free, religion itself should hold no influence in Government. So Mark&#039;s statements about &quot;recognizing the Laws of &#8230; Nature&rsquo;s God&quot;, and &quot;&#8230; ceased to recognize that our rights come ONLY from our Creator&quot; (emphasis mine) really have no place here. In today&#039;s atmosphere of scientific understanding and mistrust of organized religion, such statements can only lose people from the following. They will not result in overall gain. </p>
<p>Just in general, the list of grievances could be much better worded. There are some serious omissions and there are other things that arguably should not be there, at least in the form they appear. If the idea is to gain followers and intellectual mind share, this could be done much better. </p>
<p>I agree with most of the sentiment, just not the wording. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A “New” Declaration of Independence  &#8211; ronlennex.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/02/a-new-declaration-of-independence/#comment-1921</link>
		<dc:creator>A “New” Declaration of Independence  &#8211; ronlennex.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=2880#comment-1921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A “New” Declaration of Independence &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A “New” Declaration of Independence | Tenth Amendment Center Blog. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
