<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wyoming Legislature Passes the Firearms Freedom Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SpongeBart</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>SpongeBart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3613#comment-2358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s understood that Congress regulates commerce between states so that one state does not cut-off another, impose sanctions, or impede another from buying or selling elsewhere. It is not the federal authority to micro-manage the commerce WITHIN that state, as it is the authority of the state government for which it exists--then why have a state government if the feds do everything?  
 
There has to be swift and brutal punishment for anyone federal official that treads upon this state law. If there is no teeth, then it will not work. BUT, what will happen, as it always does, the fed with withhold federal money until the state backs down, and this law will be worthless.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s understood that Congress regulates commerce between states so that one state does not cut-off another, impose sanctions, or impede another from buying or selling elsewhere. It is not the federal authority to micro-manage the commerce WITHIN that state, as it is the authority of the state government for which it exists&#8211;then why have a state government if the feds do everything?  </p>
<p>There has to be swift and brutal punishment for anyone federal official that treads upon this state law. If there is no teeth, then it will not work. BUT, what will happen, as it always does, the fed with withhold federal money until the state backs down, and this law will be worthless.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wyoming Firearms Freedom Act: Nullification with Teeth &#171; Craig W. Wright</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2357</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wyoming Firearms Freedom Act: Nullification with Teeth &#171; Craig W. Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3613#comment-2357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] information about the Wyoming Firearms Act can be found here, here, and [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] information about the Wyoming Firearms Act can be found here, here, and [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3613#comment-2356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyoming Governor Signs 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolution &#171; The Tonka Report</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyoming Governor Signs 10th Amendment Sovereignty Resolution &#171; The Tonka Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3613#comment-2355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution : STATESMAN SENTINEL</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2354</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution : STATESMAN SENTINEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3613#comment-2354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution &#171; NWO News</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution &#171; NWO News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3613#comment-2353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution &#171; Sense of Deception</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution &#171; Sense of Deception</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3613#comment-2352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2351</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3613#comment-2351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step &#8211; and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a &#8220;Firearms Freedom Act&#8221; into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by other states that take the next step &#8211; and work to nullify specific federal laws seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that 2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a &#8220;Firearms Freedom Act&#8221; into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming the fourth. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Minuteman</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Minuteman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3613#comment-2348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael: 
 
My prior question is directed at anyone who can comment.   
 
If anyone does learn of an intrepid manufacturer who is beginning to make &#039;Single State Firearms&#039;, please post links so it can be verified.   I&#039;m sure such a development would be worthy of an article, no ? 
 
I have heard that one strategy that has been theorized is that the Federal Government plans to revoke any Federal Firearms License if they would take part in a &#039;Single State Firearm&#039; plan. 
 
OK, that is their perogative. 
 
Which would mean (to my understanding) one of two things: 
 
1) State in question would defend their citizen / FFL holder in court proceedings against the Fed Gov for such an action (to maintain their current FFL status, while taking part in SSF sales    or 
 
2) A new category of &#039;In State Guns Only&#039; dealer, working under the newly created State Statute, would arise, that is no part of the FFL dealer structure, over which the FG would have no sway. 
 
It would seem there should be no shortage of enterprising businesses that would jump at this chance for new business &amp; customers. 
 
For &#039;In State Only Gun Sales&#039; to begin, it seems that all that would be practically needed is: 
 
1)  State willingness to defend said merchant from any attempted Federal Action  
2)  Manufacturer of &#039;In State Guns&#039; 
3)  Line of hungry customers at the door...... 
 
Some exciting times we live in.  I will check back often to see how this all develops &amp; post anything I see here. 
 
I pray God grants us &amp; we are willing to muster up the intestinal fortitude to enjoin &amp; engage all these challenges. 
 
To quote Patrick Henry, we are engaged in .....&#039; the animating Contest of Freedom.....&#039; 
 
TM 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: </p>
<p>My prior question is directed at anyone who can comment.   </p>
<p>If anyone does learn of an intrepid manufacturer who is beginning to make &#039;Single State Firearms&#039;, please post links so it can be verified.   I&#039;m sure such a development would be worthy of an article, no ? </p>
<p>I have heard that one strategy that has been theorized is that the Federal Government plans to revoke any Federal Firearms License if they would take part in a &#039;Single State Firearm&#039; plan. </p>
<p>OK, that is their perogative. </p>
<p>Which would mean (to my understanding) one of two things: </p>
<p>1) State in question would defend their citizen / FFL holder in court proceedings against the Fed Gov for such an action (to maintain their current FFL status, while taking part in SSF sales    or </p>
<p>2) A new category of &#039;In State Guns Only&#039; dealer, working under the newly created State Statute, would arise, that is no part of the FFL dealer structure, over which the FG would have no sway. </p>
<p>It would seem there should be no shortage of enterprising businesses that would jump at this chance for new business &amp; customers. </p>
<p>For &#039;In State Only Gun Sales&#039; to begin, it seems that all that would be practically needed is: </p>
<p>1)  State willingness to defend said merchant from any attempted Federal Action<br />
2)  Manufacturer of &#039;In State Guns&#039;<br />
3)  Line of hungry customers at the door&#8230;&#8230; </p>
<p>Some exciting times we live in.  I will check back often to see how this all develops &amp; post anything I see here. </p>
<p>I pray God grants us &amp; we are willing to muster up the intestinal fortitude to enjoin &amp; engage all these challenges. </p>
<p>To quote Patrick Henry, we are engaged in &#8230;..&#039; the animating Contest of Freedom&#8230;..&#039; </p>
<p>TM </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Minuteman</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/03/wyoming-legislature-passes-the-firearms-freedom-act/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Minuteman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3613#comment-2350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RedKnight: 
 
I get your frustration.  The nomenclature wrangling sure seems tedious sometimes.  Try to hang in there - a little word can make a great difference in meaning.   When we trade words for bullets, it&#039;s hard to put that genie back in the bottle. 
 
Can I provide a link to an interview that both you Militia minded citizen &amp; Michael Boldin &amp; other more &#039;Lawful&#039; minded characters can appreciate ?  This is really appropriate to the whole thread &amp; the FFA construct.  The subject, Edwin Vieira, Jr. lectured to my Law School 10 years ago -he&#039;s not just a Harvard Scholar, but a genuine real deal guy - a thinker who fights, and a fighter who thinks.   
 
See if you don&#039;t agree: 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedailybell.com/724/Edwin-Vieira-the-Coming-Military-Crackdown.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thedailybell.com/724/Edwin-Vieira-the-...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
I have a DVD of his talk he gave our group on this topc.  Post back here if you&#039;d like one or they may be obtainable by the folks at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.IOTConline.com,&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.IOTConline.com,&lt;/a&gt; who produced the video. 
 
Couldn&#039;t be a more timely topic............ ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RedKnight: </p>
<p>I get your frustration.  The nomenclature wrangling sure seems tedious sometimes.  Try to hang in there &#8211; a little word can make a great difference in meaning.   When we trade words for bullets, it&#039;s hard to put that genie back in the bottle. </p>
<p>Can I provide a link to an interview that both you Militia minded citizen &amp; Michael Boldin &amp; other more &#039;Lawful&#039; minded characters can appreciate ?  This is really appropriate to the whole thread &amp; the FFA construct.  The subject, Edwin Vieira, Jr. lectured to my Law School 10 years ago -he&#039;s not just a Harvard Scholar, but a genuine real deal guy &#8211; a thinker who fights, and a fighter who thinks.   </p>
<p>See if you don&#039;t agree: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedailybell.com/724/Edwin-Vieira-the-Coming-Military-Crackdown.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.thedailybell.com/724/Edwin-Vieira-the-" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedailybell.com/724/Edwin-Vieira-the-</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>I have a DVD of his talk he gave our group on this topc.  Post back here if you&#039;d like one or they may be obtainable by the folks at <a href="http://www.IOTConline.com," rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.IOTConline.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.IOTConline.com</a>, who produced the video. </p>
<p>Couldn&#039;t be a more timely topic&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
