<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Wrong with States&#8217; Rights?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/06/whats-wrong-with-states-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/06/whats-wrong-with-states-rights/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/06/whats-wrong-with-states-rights/#comment-2987</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4765#comment-2987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So long as the Tenther movement concerns itself with preserving for the states unenumerated powers, and leaves the enumerated ones for the federal government to address, it will be on solid Constitutional ground. But the idea that a state may interpose itself in an area defined as a federal responsibility, like coining money, declaring war, or dealing with illegal immigration, is on weak footing if any. 
 
The right thing for Arizona to do is to continue to operate under its new law, and sue (or counter-sue) the United States for a court order to implement standing illegal entry laws. 
It is still their job, and they shoud perform it and pay for it! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So long as the Tenther movement concerns itself with preserving for the states unenumerated powers, and leaves the enumerated ones for the federal government to address, it will be on solid Constitutional ground. But the idea that a state may interpose itself in an area defined as a federal responsibility, like coining money, declaring war, or dealing with illegal immigration, is on weak footing if any. </p>
<p>The right thing for Arizona to do is to continue to operate under its new law, and sue (or counter-sue) the United States for a court order to implement standing illegal entry laws.<br />
It is still their job, and they shoud perform it and pay for it! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention What’s Wrong with States’ Rights? &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/06/whats-wrong-with-states-rights/#comment-2986</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention What’s Wrong with States’ Rights? &#124; Tenth Amendment Center Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4765#comment-2986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, Natalie Neal . Natalie Neal said: RT @TenthAmendment: #10th: What&#039;s Wrong with States&#039; Rights? http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/06/whats-wrong-with-states-rights/ [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, Natalie Neal . Natalie Neal said: RT @TenthAmendment: #10th: What&#039;s Wrong with States&#039; Rights? <a href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/06/whats-wrong-with-states-rights/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/06/whats-wrong-with-states-rights/</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
