Why the ObamaCare Tax Penalty Is Unconstitutional

  • Share on Tumblr

Kenneth Blackwell and Kenneth Klukowski in the WSJ. Here’s an excerpt:

The Justice Department announced last week that it would defend the new federal health-insurance mandate as an exercise of Congress’s “power to lay and collect taxes,” even though Barack Obama had insisted before the bill’s passage that it was “absolutely not a tax increase.” The truth is the mandate is not a tax—and if it were it would be unconstitutional.

A tax is when the government takes money from individuals, puts it in the Treasury, and plans to spend it. With the health-insurance mandate, the government is not taking money from private individuals; rather, it is commanding them to give …

It’s registration-enabled, but a good read:
click here for the full article

Or, read Rob Natelson’s take on it – here, here and here.

About Michael Boldin

Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter - @michaelboldin, on LinkedIn, and on Facebook.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?

, ,

0 comments

Trackbacks

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, Jim Kay. Jim Kay said: RT @TenthAmendment: #10th: Why the ObamaCare Tax Penalty Is Unconstitutional http://bit.ly/aJbqSN [...]