PHOENIX (Mar. 19, 2015) – Today, an Arizona House committee passed a bill that would effectively block any new federal gun control measures in the state by withdrawing all state participation and enforcement. It previously passed the full state Senate, 17-12, and today’s vote was 5-3.

Introduced by Sen. Kelli Ward, Senate Bill 1330 (SB1330) would prohibit state agencies and employees from enforcing – or even assisting in the enforcement of – any new “federal act, law, order, rule or regulation” that restricts ownership of a personal firearm, firearm accessory or ammunition within Arizona.

“We have to put our foot down and express our sovereignty,” said Ward.

This language puts the bill in harmony with recently amended Article 2, Section 3 of the Arizona Constitution, also known as Proposition 122, which voters approved last fall to enshrine a process to refuse state cooperation with unconstitutional federal acts in the state constitution.

SB1330 is similar to a bill that was signed into law in Idaho last year, and was passed by the Montana Legislature this month. It has received support from Gun Owners of America and Arizona Citizens Defense League, the state’s preeminent pro-gun lobby.

“Passage of SB1330 will draw a line in the sand and ensure that the feds will have an extremely difficult time trying to get any new gun control measures enforced in Arizona,” said Scott Landreth of ShallNot.org. “This sets the foundation for further action if passed. From there, Arizona gun rights activists will have something to build on until all federal gun control is where it belong – dead and gone.”

LEGAL AND EFFECTIVE

Opposition was strong from both Lyle Mann of the Arizona peace officers standards and trainings board and Rep. Stefanie Mach (D-Tucson). Mann didn’t want to ban the state from participating in future federal gun control, because, as he claimed, agencies like the TSA are constantly changing regulations, and this could have the effect of stopping state agents from someday flying while armed in the future.

“The fact is that the vast majority of federal laws or rules on guns and ammo have a direct infringement on the right to keep and bear arms,” said Landreth. “In the rare case that the feds might, possibly, maybe change something for the positive in the future is no reason to keep the status quo, that is – Arizona continuing to help the feds violate our right to keep and bear arms.”

On the other hand, Mach claimed the bill was “blatantly unconstitutional,” but this couldn’t be further from the truth for anyone versed in modern Supreme Court jurisprudence and the advice of the Founders.

Refusing to participate with federal enforcement has been sanctioned by the Supreme Court in a number of major cases, dating from 1842. The 1997 case, Printz v. US serves as the cornerstone. In it, Justice Scalia held:

The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. 

As noted Georgetown Law Constitutional Scholar Randy Barnett has said, “This line of cases is now considered well settled.”

Based on James Madison’s advice for states and individuals in Federalist #46, a “refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union” is an extremely effectively method to bring down federal gun control measures because most enforcement actions rely on help, support and leadership in the states.

Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano agreed. In a recent televised discussion on the issue, he noted that a single state taking this step would make federal gun laws “nearly impossible” to enforce.

MOMENTUM

Introduction comes at a time when several other states are considering similar bills, building momentum and support for the effort to block federal gun control at the state level.

“We know from experience that when ten or more states pass laws that seek to block federal acts, the federal government has an extremely difficult time with enforcement,” said Michael Gibbs of ShallNot.org.

SB1330 will now move to the House Rules committee for further consideration.

TAKE ACTION IN SUPPORT

In Arizona, follow all the steps to support this bill at THIS LINK

All other states, contact your state legislator and encourage them to introduce similar legislation to stop federal gun control at this link.


Concordia res parvae crescunt


Small things grow great by concord...

Tenth Amendment Center


"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."


FOLLOW US

Get in Touch

7 + 15 =


MAIL:
PO BOX 13458
Los Angeles, CA 90013


PHONE:
213.935.0553

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

LEARN MORE

01

Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles

02

Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog

03

State of the Nullification Movement

108 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report

01

Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty

02

maharrey minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens.

maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues – history, and application today

TENTHER ESSENTIALS

Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!

JOIN TAC

01

The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose – the “Foundation of the Constitution.”

10th Amendment

03

Nullification

Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history – and today.

nullification