“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
This post offers a few thoughts in response to the recent post on this blog by David Weisberg. I agree with the main points of his post, but disagree as to their implications. His post (and other related work) argues that if the original meaning of the words in the...
In a recent post, I noted that originalism—construing a text as its makers understood it—is the standard interpretative technique for most legal documents. It is principally in interpreting some parts of the Constitution (and only since the mid-20th century) that the...
John McGinnis and I have just published a new article on Original Methods Originalism, the interpretive theory that we have developed. In this post, I wanted to describe the first part of the article. In a second post, John will describe the latter part of our piece....
Whenever a president nominates to the Supreme Court someone who pledges to apply the Constitution as written, liberal commentators emerge to explain why this is a bad idea. They claim that “originalism” — applying the Constitution as the Founders understood it — is...
“Originalism” is how the Founders expected the Constitution to be interpreted. On this episode of Good Morning Liberty, Michael Boldin (follow) goes over the basic principles of constitutional originalism and shares some tips on how to use them to...
Recently, I was having a discussion with a law professor who looks at matters from a historical perspective. While such law professors are not professional historians, many of them have adopted the historian’s perspective. During our discussion, one aspect of...