Three leading anti-NSA senators, Rand Paul (R-KY), Mark Udall (D-CO) and Ron Wyden (D-OR), recently penned an op/ed in the Los Angeles Times talking about the need for bipartisan reform to save the 4th Amendment and rein in government surveillance. They correctly identify the problems, but their solutions leave much to be desired.

In their Jun. 16 article “How to end the NSA dragnet,” they talked about the public reaction to the Snowden leaks and how it has changed the political landscape forever saying,

When the programs’ existence became public last summer, huge numbers of Americans were justifiably stunned and angry at how they had been misled and by the degree to which their privacy rights had been routinely violated. Inflated claims about the program’s value have burst under public scrutiny, and there is now a groundswell of public support for reform.

That is certainly the case, and the three senators deserve a great deal of credit for keeping the issue in the public eye and forming a bipartisan coalition against NSA spying. However, their actual plan is suspect. They want the people to rely on national-level action to fix things. They want us to trust the feds to get their own acts in order. Here is their reform plan in their own words:

This package of reforms includes overhauling domestic surveillance laws to ban the bulk collection of Americans’ personal information, and closing the loophole that allows intelligence agencies to deliberately read Americans’ emails without a warrant. It includes reshaping the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court by installing an advocate who can argue for Americans’ constitutional rights when the court is considering major cases, and by requiring that significant interpretations of U.S. law and the Constitution be made public. And it would strengthen and clarify the government’s authority to obtain individual records quickly in genuine emergency situations.

These reforms are underwhelming, to say the least. Strengthening and clarifying the government’s authority to quickly obtain records should be the last thing we do after the NSA was caught betraying the public trust and continuously violating our privacy rights. As for the advocate, who’s to say that that person won’t become corrupted like the rest of the federal government? Who’s to say that the NSA follows any of these reforms at all? They have already violated the 4th Amendment repeatedly. What makes us think the they wouldn’t just disobey this new reform scheme as well?

Our rights are too important for us to entrust them with the proven malicious liars at the NSA. While there is no reason to believe that Senators Paul, Udall and Wyden don’t mean well, their plan would likely accomplish little other than to make the public think that everything is fine while the NSA continues business as usual. The best way to fight the NSA is by denying it the compliance and material support that it needs to function. That can be achieved away from the federal government at the state level.

With the OffNow plan to turn the NSA’s water off, there is no mystery involved. There is no relying on the NSA to abide by the law. There is no relying on judges or public advocates to do the right thing. There is no relying on Congress to pass a bill without watering it down or otherwise taking the teeth out of it. Our reform plan can be accomplished far away from the army of bureaucrats in Washington D.C. We work at the state level to subvert unlawful federal power, and it works because the NSA needs our help more than it wants us to realize.

Without state level support, the NSA wouldn’t have the resources that it needs to spy on us. It wastes millions of gallons per day, usually taken from local municipalities, on its plan to destroy our anonymity and privacy rights forever. This can be stopped with legislation. With our 4th Amendment Protection Act, we also stop the federalization of local governments and police departments, corporate profiteering, environmental degradation, and university infiltration in one fell swoop.

Rather than hoping for the NSA to suddenly become honest and abide by the law that they have already shown to repeatedly break, our plan pulls the rug right out from under it. We aim to cripple Big Brother, giving it no recourse but to fade into oblivion. Don’t put the power in the hands of a bought-off Congress. Take the power in your own hands, and get involved in your state and local community. That is where the NSA can be hit the hardest.

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”



Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles


Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog


State of the Nullification Movement

232 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report


Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty


Maharrey Minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens. maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues - history, and application today


Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!



The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose - the "Foundation of the Constitution."

10th Amendment



Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history - and today.