In 2012, Barack Obama signed the NDAA into law, a bill that suspended the writ of habeas corpus in the United States.

Not many noticed, and Obama himself tried to downplay the significance of the bill by issuing a “signing statement” designed to soften the blow to civil liberties.

For those that don’t understand the terms “signing statement” or habeas corpus, I’ll help.

A “signing statement” is a soft line item veto. Essentially, the president issues a statement saying that he disagrees with that portion of the bill and will not likely enforce it. These are illegal, at least according to the Constitution as ratified, and Obama made headlines when as a candidate he promised to never issue signing statements.

Habeas Corpus is one of the most important civil liberties in the Anglo-American tradition. It literally means “produce the body” and is a shield against arbitrary arrest and indefinite detention. If you are arrested, you have to be charged with a crime. The government can’t just lock you up and throw away the key without charges or a trial.

It is so important, the founding generation placed it in the Constitution–under the powers of the legislature.

That’s where Obama’s action is interesting. He did nothing wrong by signing the bill. Congress suspended habeas corpus. But the “Constitutional scholar” Obama should have vetoed the legislation as it allows the military to arrest anyone on “suspicion” of illegal activity.

Not evidence. Suspicion.

You know who else suspended habeas corpus for this reason? Lincoln. But at least to Obama’s credit, he allowed Congress to do the dirty work. This was the proper constitutional method. Lincoln did it unilaterally and then let Congress back it up later. And don’t be fooled by the Righteous Cause Mythologists who insist the “Davis suspended habeas corpus too!” Yes, the Confederate Congress authorized Davis to suspend the writ, but unlike Lincoln, Davis waited for legislative approval before acting.

It still doesn’t make Obama’s move necessary or legally sound, and it could very easily be used to detain any American citizen for, say, “domestic” terrorism. After all, that is what the NDAA targeted, terrorists.

If the general government is “suspicions” about your activity, the military can arrest you and hold you forever if they choose.

Why? Because the suspension of habeas corpus has been extended for the last decade.

This is why so many people are wary of the expansion of the government’s “watch” list for political organizations.

The most important speech to protect is political speech. Every Englishman knew it for centuries.

But we seem to have forgotten that lesson.

I discuss the suspension on episode 681 of The Brion McClanahan Show.

You can watch it here.

OR

You can listen to it and download it here.

Latest posts by Brion McClanahan (see all)

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

LEARN MORE

01

Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles

02

Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog

03

State of the Nullification Movement

108 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report

01

Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty

02

Maharrey Minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens. maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues - history, and application today

TENTHER ESSENTIALS

Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!

JOIN TAC

01

The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose - the "Foundation of the Constitution."

10th Amendment

03

Nullification

Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history - and today.

nullification