While supporters – and opponents – of the monster state often point to 3 New Deal era cases as pivotal for expansion of federal power under the Commerce Clause, it’s important to go even further back, to 1824, and John Marshall’s landmark opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden.
Path to Liberty, Fast Friday Edition: November 20, 2020
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple | Spotify | Podbean | Google | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS | More Platforms Here
SHOW LINKS:
JOIN TAC
Four Cases that Expanded the Commerce Clause
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942)
How One Landmark Case Shaped the Commerce Clause
Gibbons v. Ogden: Defining Congress’ power under the Commerce Clause
Randy Barnett: Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause
The greatly misunderstood Chief Justice John Marshall
ALTERNATE VIDEO SOURCES
Watch on LBRY
FOLLOW and SUPPORT TAC:
Become a Member: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/
Email Newsletter: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/register
RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/tacdailydigest
Brave: Use Brave Browser for Privacy and Help Support TAC
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/TenthAmendmentCenter
Twitter: http://twitter.com/tenthamendment
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tenthamendmentcenter/
Periscope: https://www.periscope.tv/TenthAmendment/
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/tenthamendmentcenter
DLive: https://dlive.tv/TenthAmendmentCenter
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tenthamendmentcenter
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/X0AJnBhWbCkx/
Minds: https://www.minds.com/TenthAmendmentCenter
LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@TenthAmendmentCenter
- They’re Lying: No-Knock Warrant Edition - July 23, 2021
- Court Packing: Unnecessary and Improper - July 21, 2021
- No Representation: Antifederalist Brutus No. 4 - July 19, 2021