<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Left vs TenthAmendmentCenter.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/the-left-vs-tenthamendmentcenter-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/the-left-vs-tenthamendmentcenter-com/</link>
	<description>The Tenther Grapevine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:08:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/the-left-vs-tenthamendmentcenter-com/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=253#comment-309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re right, Patrick.  People that don&#039;t understand the constitution need to be shown how it&#039;s not only right to limit government, but also how it will benefit them.    I always heard that perspective from the late, great Harry Browne, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right, Patrick.  People that don&#8217;t understand the constitution need to be shown how it&#8217;s not only right to limit government, but also how it will benefit them.    I always heard that perspective from the late, great Harry Browne, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Krey</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/the-left-vs-tenthamendmentcenter-com/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Krey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=253#comment-308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kill &#039;em with kindness, I always say. Just keep politely hammering the point that liberals can benefit from the 10th just as much as conservatives like you did above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kill &#8216;em with kindness, I always say. Just keep politely hammering the point that liberals can benefit from the 10th just as much as conservatives like you did above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monorprise</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/the-left-vs-tenthamendmentcenter-com/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Monorprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=253#comment-307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t rename it with an sensitivity apology?  Are we concerned about accuracy or ideology?

I do not think anyone is claiming to be perfect, all of us come from partisan backgrounds with a diversity of opinion and believes.

It is precisely because we know of our differences that we have come to the conclusion that we should not be forced to live under the same exact policy.  That we should in fact be able to: “agree to disagree”

A little tolerance is necessary on both sides in recognition of our particular view views on any other issues as entirely irrelevant.  It doesn’t matter if you’re for or against drug control, abortion, gun control, ect…  As long as your willing to let them be done at the State level not Federal level.  Let the States act as mini-counties on theses matters, and let us leave each other alone in peace.


In other words the 10th amendment movement is motivated by our: “agreeing to disagree”, and to that end our agreement on any other matter is not required, nor is it particularly desired.

Don’t let our particular political views on any other matters confuse you, as to the merit of the cause of Federalism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t rename it with an sensitivity apology?  Are we concerned about accuracy or ideology?</p>
<p>I do not think anyone is claiming to be perfect, all of us come from partisan backgrounds with a diversity of opinion and believes.</p>
<p>It is precisely because we know of our differences that we have come to the conclusion that we should not be forced to live under the same exact policy.  That we should in fact be able to: “agree to disagree”</p>
<p>A little tolerance is necessary on both sides in recognition of our particular view views on any other issues as entirely irrelevant.  It doesn’t matter if you’re for or against drug control, abortion, gun control, ect…  As long as your willing to let them be done at the State level not Federal level.  Let the States act as mini-counties on theses matters, and let us leave each other alone in peace.</p>
<p>In other words the 10th amendment movement is motivated by our: “agreeing to disagree”, and to that end our agreement on any other matter is not required, nor is it particularly desired.</p>
<p>Don’t let our particular political views on any other matters confuse you, as to the merit of the cause of Federalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/the-left-vs-tenthamendmentcenter-com/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=253#comment-306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most amazing thing here is that I fell into the same trap that I was warning about.  Wow.  Really should&#039;ve titled it something like &quot;Statist Media vs TenthAmendmentCenter.com&quot; or something like that.  guess there&#039;s next time - there will be plenty more to come!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most amazing thing here is that I fell into the same trap that I was warning about.  Wow.  Really should&#8217;ve titled it something like &#8220;Statist Media vs TenthAmendmentCenter.com&#8221; or something like that.  guess there&#8217;s next time &#8211; there will be plenty more to come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
